Why Housing is going to Struggle


I have written several times about the housing market from several different directions, and so I wanted to share another voice on the issue.  The following post is written by Adam Rust and is a cross-post from www.banktalk.org.  I would encourage everyone to follow his blog as well for more in-depth analysis of the financial world.

 

Today I am going to argue why housing prices are going to stall.

It is an argument based on a few “big stories.” The first reason is that people are not forming households like they have in the past. Unfortunately, the problems are compounded by a significant difference in the asset base of future buyers. Growth in household formation has been on hold. How long can people put off buying a home?

Today I am going to list a few reasons why housing prices are not going to recover anytime soon. There are a few problems in play. The root of the issue is household formation. If you think that people are finally going to start trying to set out on their own, then you are probably optimistic about housing. If you think it is the other way around – where people are going to stay put – then you are probably skeptical.

Household formation is a product of jobs. When a person gets a steady job with a decent paycheck, they can start looking for a place to live. It is also a product of household leverage. No one with student loans and no job decides to rent an apartment if they can instead live with their parents.

For a long time, more and more Americans have been setting off to have their own place. Back in the 50s, the average household consisted of 3.6 people. Now that number is just 2.6. It isn’t for a lack of room, either. Houses have been getting bigger. The idea that people are going to get a place to live just because they are tired of sleeping in a guest bedroom does not hold up.

The decision to move into a home of your own is driven by economics.

Economics is also the driver of whether or not you decide to buy a home or to rent. Sometimes people rent because they want to remain mobile, but more often they do so because they don’t have enough money saved to make a down payment.

The force of demography cannot be ignored: In the future, the renting or owning decision will be further factored by demographics. Simply put, the kinds of people who are going to be forming households in the near future are most likely going to be people without a lot of money. Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies says that minorities will make up 7 of every 10 new households over the next decade. This is no knock against people of color. It is just an unfortunate fact that wealth isn’t distributed equally across lines of color. It actually growing more and more disparate. According to Pew, assets held by white households are now 19 times greater than those held by African-Americans and about 17 times that of Latinos.

Voila! More renters and fewer buyers. Homeownership rates are already less than half for Latinos and African-Americans.

Fewer immigrants are coming to America.

The jobs problem spills over to demographics, as well. According to the Census Bureau, the number of new immigrants has dropped during each of the last four years. There were 400,000 fewer new immigrant households coming to America by 2010, relative to 2007. If all of those people bought a home or rented a house, the pace of household creation would go up 25 percent. They didn’t, though, and home prices are going nowhere.

There is a cascading effect when first-time homebuyers are shut out of the market: It becomes a real problem for sellers when the people offering to buy your home can not put down three percent. The GSEs have abandoned that segment of the buyer market and private mortgage-backed securities seem unlikely to be the destination for those loans. In effect, new households won’t be home-buying households. They will be renting households.

That means that housing prices are going to stay depressed. Investors will move in as home prices fall, but the market for single-family rental housing is never going to reach an economy of scale that attracts real capital. Single-family renting is largely a habit of “mom-and-pops,” because it takes so much time to find tenants, collect rents, and maintain property. Black Rock and Goldman Sachs don’t want to own single-family housing. They will buy multi-family units where ongoing costs are lower, but they’ll need a lot of coaxing before they buy a scattered assortment of ranch homes in El Paso and Fayetteville.

Less capital means lower prices for homes.

Until we can find a way to reconcile the needs of the GSEs with the economic interest of the housing market, then home prices are going to be stay low. For the last several years, the GSEs have been doing their best to step away from low-down payment buyers. The Loan Level Pricing Adjustments have been under the radar ever since they were established in 2007, but they drive the forces that make it hard to get a loan. The LLPA rules make it difficult for anyone but 720 plus credit score borrowers to get a home with less than ten percent down.

 

Advertisements

Survival of the Richest


This post was written by Kevin Rogers and is cross posted from www.actionnc.org

 

Downtown Raleigh is just getting back to its normal pace of life this morning, with all of our distinguished representatives of the General Assembly finally back in their respective districts.

Let them cause trouble at home for a change.

The General Assembly finished up their work this Saturday.  Well, sort of – they will be back in July to finish up those tiny, itsy-bitsy issues of redistricting and veto-overrides.

But at least for now, we are blissfully free from the invaders and can once again walk down Jones Street at lunch time and not be over-run by roaming gangs of portly white men in cheap suits.

At least we all survived.  Well, kinda.

There were a few fatalities this session, in addition to the normal causalities of honor, trust, and civility.  Let’s go down the list of those who lost this year:

Women:  Do you think women have a right to choose? Sure… as long as they choose correctly! Thanks to a new bill women would have to wait 24 hours, undergo counseling and have an ultrasound (on their own dime) before having an abortion.  Oh, and Planned Parenthood funding was cut as well. Isn’t motherhood fun?

Children: The budget that was passed by the GA, vetoed by the Governor, and reinstated by the GA, cuts an additional $124m from public education this year, on top of the combined $300m reduction over the past two years, almost certainly placing us 49th in per-pupil spending in the nation.  Oh, and the 100-charter school limit was lifted as well.  If children are our future…

Voters: Want to vote these knuckleheads out of office in 2012? Better read up – the rules just changed.  Voters would have to show photo IDs at polls starting next year.  Don’t have an ID? Better get one!

Immigrants:  Do you look “undocumented”?  Too bad, because a new bill requires employers to run your info through the federal E-verify system, even though the system does not function properly and may falsely label you as illegal even if you aren’t.  Spin the wheel of fate and see what happens!

Workers: Get hurt on the job? You used to be able to at least depend on workers comp to give you a little money to get your through.  But now caps for worker’s compensation payments for most disabled workers are now set at 500 weeks. But that’s fine, right? Because after a few years your permanent disability automatically becomes less permanent – that is how it works, right?

So, as long as you aren’t yourself, or care about, women, children, voting, immigrants or anyone who works, you survived.

Kinda.